is it true that we ALL have "cancer", a moment ago that some people develop it and others dont?(if you find what i mean...)
Answers: We adjectives have the capacity to get cancer. Cancer isn't resembling a virus or a bacteria that you enjoy to come into contact with. Cancer is essentially just the uncontrolled growth (hypertrophy) of cell. Since we are all made of cell, we certainly adjectives have the propensity to carry it. Every single cell in our body (and near are about 3 trillion) have the potential to become cancerous. But there have to be some sort of alteration to the cell, a trigger, if you will. Hundreds of these agents have be identified. These agents that are thought to "turn on" cancer are known as carcinogens. Smoking is probably the best specified example. Smoking creates physical changes inside the lung cells and eventually change their shape, making them cancerous. The same cells be there adjectives along, but they needed that smoke to change their shape until that time they become cancerous.
we dont know what causes cancer , we know that in no doubt agents bring out the possibility for people to seize cancer , such as smoking and the Paolina virus
we also know there is recurrently a genetic propensity
we just don't know why it happen to some people and not others
we adjectives have the potential to achieve cancer
however we dont know is breast cancer is related to liver cancer of lung cancer our knowledge is shallow
don't know if it is true or not, but i one-sidedly have other held to this theory
When you attain the Flu?
How long until cold sore blush go away?
Temporary alternative to accutane....?
Answers: We adjectives have the capacity to get cancer. Cancer isn't resembling a virus or a bacteria that you enjoy to come into contact with. Cancer is essentially just the uncontrolled growth (hypertrophy) of cell. Since we are all made of cell, we certainly adjectives have the propensity to carry it. Every single cell in our body (and near are about 3 trillion) have the potential to become cancerous. But there have to be some sort of alteration to the cell, a trigger, if you will. Hundreds of these agents have be identified. These agents that are thought to "turn on" cancer are known as carcinogens. Smoking is probably the best specified example. Smoking creates physical changes inside the lung cells and eventually change their shape, making them cancerous. The same cells be there adjectives along, but they needed that smoke to change their shape until that time they become cancerous.
we dont know what causes cancer , we know that in no doubt agents bring out the possibility for people to seize cancer , such as smoking and the Paolina virus
we also know there is recurrently a genetic propensity
we just don't know why it happen to some people and not others
we adjectives have the potential to achieve cancer
however we dont know is breast cancer is related to liver cancer of lung cancer our knowledge is shallow
don't know if it is true or not, but i one-sidedly have other held to this theory