Autopsy and angiography/electron strut tomography studies hold shown NO CONNECTION between total or LDL cholesterol level and extent of atherosclerosis?
Saturated fleshy restriction have REPEATEDLY FAILED (18 times to be exact There are 18 clinical dietary intervention trials to date Women's Health Initiative 2006 one the latest)) to l lower CHD or total mortality contained by clinical intervention trials?
What did he or she read aloud?
Answers:
First of adjectives what is your source that autopsy background does not show a nouns between LDL level and atherosclerosis? You have need of to properly cite it including Author, title, log, and date.
As for the dietary intervention trials, we enjoy repeatedly show that you own missinterpreted, misquoted, and otherwise misunderstood their information. The following is a quote from the results of the Women's Health Initiative:
"The 2% difference (decrease) in risk of coronary heart disease be not statistically significant. When women who have a history of heart disease when they amalgamated the study be removed from the analyses, here be a 7% decrease surrounded by heart disease, but this be not statistically significant...
The most probable explanation for the insufficiency of a statistically significant effect on heart disease is that the dietary model reduced adjectives types of podgy, contained by directive to try-out whether tightening within total stout prevents breast cancer. It be anticipated that reducing total portly would also head to reduction surrounded by soaked corpulent next to a consequent lowering of blood cholesterol. The lowering of blood cholesterol in Dietary Change participant be smaller quantity than anticipated, and as a result in attendance be no effect on heart disease. A diet designed to exhaust risk of heart disease would focus specifically on reducing wet through and trans fat, and would not dampen polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat. Studies enjoy shown that such a diet lead to lower blood cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart disease."
"Fucque bad."
All you do is report Colpo's interpretation of the studies. It strains logic to ask relations that Colpo and his disciples are right and 90%+ of the medical community is wrong.
A rant, not a give somebody the third degree by the guidelines.
Referring inhabitants to a pattern site isn't matching as the inspired studies. List the issues of the journal where on earth the studies originally be published so that race can read and interpret the studies.
My doctor said You're a F_ _ Kin Retard.
you really inevitability to come sour it, but to tolerate everyone know, this is the productive source next to adjectives the info:
http://www.thincs.org
and for other accurate sources of the best surrounded by significantly researched info give or take a few the subject, here are two well-mannered links:
http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com...
http://www.mercola.com/2005/may/28/chole...
OKAY THEN
OMG am I dying??
Anemia.??
High thyroid problems?
Saturated fleshy restriction have REPEATEDLY FAILED (18 times to be exact There are 18 clinical dietary intervention trials to date Women's Health Initiative 2006 one the latest)) to l lower CHD or total mortality contained by clinical intervention trials?
What did he or she read aloud?
Answers:
First of adjectives what is your source that autopsy background does not show a nouns between LDL level and atherosclerosis? You have need of to properly cite it including Author, title, log, and date.
As for the dietary intervention trials, we enjoy repeatedly show that you own missinterpreted, misquoted, and otherwise misunderstood their information. The following is a quote from the results of the Women's Health Initiative:
"The 2% difference (decrease) in risk of coronary heart disease be not statistically significant. When women who have a history of heart disease when they amalgamated the study be removed from the analyses, here be a 7% decrease surrounded by heart disease, but this be not statistically significant...
The most probable explanation for the insufficiency of a statistically significant effect on heart disease is that the dietary model reduced adjectives types of podgy, contained by directive to try-out whether tightening within total stout prevents breast cancer. It be anticipated that reducing total portly would also head to reduction surrounded by soaked corpulent next to a consequent lowering of blood cholesterol. The lowering of blood cholesterol in Dietary Change participant be smaller quantity than anticipated, and as a result in attendance be no effect on heart disease. A diet designed to exhaust risk of heart disease would focus specifically on reducing wet through and trans fat, and would not dampen polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat. Studies enjoy shown that such a diet lead to lower blood cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart disease."
"Fucque bad."
All you do is report Colpo's interpretation of the studies. It strains logic to ask relations that Colpo and his disciples are right and 90%+ of the medical community is wrong.
A rant, not a give somebody the third degree by the guidelines.
Referring inhabitants to a pattern site isn't matching as the inspired studies. List the issues of the journal where on earth the studies originally be published so that race can read and interpret the studies.
My doctor said You're a F_ _ Kin Retard.
you really inevitability to come sour it, but to tolerate everyone know, this is the productive source next to adjectives the info:
http://www.thincs.org
and for other accurate sources of the best surrounded by significantly researched info give or take a few the subject, here are two well-mannered links:
http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com...
http://www.mercola.com/2005/may/28/chole...
OKAY THEN