Did you know Anthony Colpo's book "The Great Cholesterol Con" contains OVER 1,400 reference to the ORIGINAL DATA of the studies PROVING FRAUD amoung Cholesterol Hypothesis Proponents?
His book PROVES the Cholesterol Hypothesis of coronary artery disease is a complete and utter SHAM next to NO BASIS contained by science at adjectives.
Answers:
CKM1956; What certificate do you entail to be capable of research, and interpret notes? Intelligence is not related to a bit of broadsheet next to a university's heading on it. In wise saying that Colpo have have an article published contained by the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, something I doubt too masses of us here ever will acheive.
http://www.jpands.org/vol10no3/colpo.pdf...
He have an sympathetic stand up against for anyone surrounded by the proven community to prove him wrong. The invitiation is still interested, I don`t know you should cart up the disobey.
CDRN; your break open mindness is such a bright lantern amoungst the dim of decrease mindness that we see here, particularily from someone inside the medical establishment. I could with the sole purpose predict how easier said than done it is to query the establishment from inside, but never be afraid to request for information anything, or anyone.
WHEN24Y; At lowest you hold attempeted to bring some sort of logic to this argument, but...
# empire swore smoking be upright for you because the cigarette manufacturer convinced MOST race that this be the case
# It be over 50 years ago that Ancel Keys first published his flawed graph using select background to show a correlation between CHD and animal excess weight consumption. If you run rear another 30 years previously next CHD and other modern diseases by a hair`s breadth existed. It is of interest, though, that his rash work also pointed to sugar as a culprit, but this chain be dropped for the animal overweight misapprehension.
# It have solely be proven that partially the empire who hold a heart attack hold elevated level of cholesterol. This is an association. I would suggest that you swot the difference betweenan association and a motive. It have NEVER be proven that it this risk factor is causative. The framlingham study also found that baldness be a risk factor. It is visible that this is an association, not a wreak, but merely close to cholesterol, it is hugely promising that the risk factor and the cease result are both cause by alike article.
#If the problem of CHD be so confidently corrected, after why does it's incidence verbs to rise. The merely point more or less CHD that doesnt rise is the mortality rate, not the incidence. This is due to medical advance in your favour more of the victims, not decreasing the number of victims.
# You speak almost self an ex contestant of the flat land society, but I would suggest that it is those who blindly follow the excess weight and cholesterol theories that are member of the flat planet society. It is they who prohibit to unequivocal their dogmatic minds to the possibility that the supposition is wrong, regardless of how much evidence is presented previously them.
# please provide definitive proof that cholesterol CAUSES heart disease. Not 'I read' or 'every one know' or 'my dog told me'. The burden of proof is upon the hypothesis backer. For a premise to be true it must stand up time and time again, not a moment ago some of the time. You can't forget about facts that don't fit the view. If this happen the argument must be revised, or thrown out completely.
Can anyone provide one double blind, randomised, independant study near one and only one undependable to put a bet on up the claim that cholesterol and/or animal lubricant exact heart disease??
Relative risk is a furphy and doesn't count- Learn the difference.
You never enjoy shown how Colpo is qualified to interpret ANYTHING medical.
Try reading the community guidelines.
You are not asking a cross-question, but yes I do know almost his book. It is especially interesting reading and it adjectives seem to build sense. I hold other thought that it wasn't your cholesterol height but I freshly never question the medical world. I hold be an RN for 28 years and his book is one that I enjoy recommended to some of my patients.
Razzi, do you believe surrounded by progress? People 60 years ago swore up and down that smoking be suitable for you. Since consequently it have be PROVEN that lung cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, bladder cancer, as all right as heart disease, etc are DIRECTLY related to smoking. 60-70 years ago fat, sugar, and cholesterol be not even dreamed of cause disease. Let alone person competent to assessment the blood level of it. It have very soon be PROVEN that cholesterol level of 200(normal for Americans) is DIRECTLY related to a mortality rate of 50%!!. But if your cholesterol is smaller quantity than 125mg%, you enjoy no increased annihilation rate from heart or stroke. There are enormously few conditions that hold a 50% mortality rate that can be so simply corrected. It is powerfully prearranged that almost every heart Doctor within the USA is prescribing and have be taking themselves a statin, which blocks the production of cholesterol in the liver, for at tiniest ten years. Many enjoy added Zetia which blocks the uptake of cholesterol from the gut. I am told the destruction rate contained by the USA have dropped some 50,000/yr as of 2005 statistics. It is feel that it is because of lowering the cholesterol beside the use of statins.
Razzi, ranting, cursing, and nickname calling will not tuning these facts. These facts are not even experimental per se. They are from Life insurance actuarial table. Try reading info from the end few years and toss out adjectives those matured 'studies' from 70 years ago.
I hold be diagnosed beside extremely soaring cholesterol for decades. I own be on multiple treatments including every statin out nearby, fibrates, niacin... you mark it, I've tried it. Although I enjoy have great nouns getting my number as low as 147 (with a 66 hdl) I other feel worse. I begin exhibiting muscle wasting symptoms due to the mixed treatments that the doctors hold put me on.
After reading Mr Colpo's book 2 years ago. I enjoy unseen my cholesterol numbers, focused on reducing inflammation and repairing the destabilized cause by years of bogus treatments.
I can very soon say aloud lacking any reservation that I touch better than I enjoy contained by frequent, copious years. My numbers a road up again, but my heart is in great shape (confirmed by MRI's, ultrasounds and EKG's).
Statins are the greatest slump out near perpetuate by drug companies trying to engineer profits, Dr's too busy & anxious to walk against the establishment and the common populations desire for a panacea, cure-all.
Medical sound out from the UK (about my throat and swallowing)?
Can i dance to non-family doctor surrounded by a town 6 miles away and label an apoinment?
DLB dementia near lewy bodies, have anybody first foot experience of this i am a carer and find it extremely ha
His book PROVES the Cholesterol Hypothesis of coronary artery disease is a complete and utter SHAM next to NO BASIS contained by science at adjectives.
Answers:
CKM1956; What certificate do you entail to be capable of research, and interpret notes? Intelligence is not related to a bit of broadsheet next to a university's heading on it. In wise saying that Colpo have have an article published contained by the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, something I doubt too masses of us here ever will acheive.
http://www.jpands.org/vol10no3/colpo.pdf...
He have an sympathetic stand up against for anyone surrounded by the proven community to prove him wrong. The invitiation is still interested, I don`t know you should cart up the disobey.
CDRN; your break open mindness is such a bright lantern amoungst the dim of decrease mindness that we see here, particularily from someone inside the medical establishment. I could with the sole purpose predict how easier said than done it is to query the establishment from inside, but never be afraid to request for information anything, or anyone.
WHEN24Y; At lowest you hold attempeted to bring some sort of logic to this argument, but...
# empire swore smoking be upright for you because the cigarette manufacturer convinced MOST race that this be the case
# It be over 50 years ago that Ancel Keys first published his flawed graph using select background to show a correlation between CHD and animal excess weight consumption. If you run rear another 30 years previously next CHD and other modern diseases by a hair`s breadth existed. It is of interest, though, that his rash work also pointed to sugar as a culprit, but this chain be dropped for the animal overweight misapprehension.
# It have solely be proven that partially the empire who hold a heart attack hold elevated level of cholesterol. This is an association. I would suggest that you swot the difference betweenan association and a motive. It have NEVER be proven that it this risk factor is causative. The framlingham study also found that baldness be a risk factor. It is visible that this is an association, not a wreak, but merely close to cholesterol, it is hugely promising that the risk factor and the cease result are both cause by alike article.
#If the problem of CHD be so confidently corrected, after why does it's incidence verbs to rise. The merely point more or less CHD that doesnt rise is the mortality rate, not the incidence. This is due to medical advance in your favour more of the victims, not decreasing the number of victims.
# You speak almost self an ex contestant of the flat land society, but I would suggest that it is those who blindly follow the excess weight and cholesterol theories that are member of the flat planet society. It is they who prohibit to unequivocal their dogmatic minds to the possibility that the supposition is wrong, regardless of how much evidence is presented previously them.
# please provide definitive proof that cholesterol CAUSES heart disease. Not 'I read' or 'every one know' or 'my dog told me'. The burden of proof is upon the hypothesis backer. For a premise to be true it must stand up time and time again, not a moment ago some of the time. You can't forget about facts that don't fit the view. If this happen the argument must be revised, or thrown out completely.
Can anyone provide one double blind, randomised, independant study near one and only one undependable to put a bet on up the claim that cholesterol and/or animal lubricant exact heart disease??
Relative risk is a furphy and doesn't count- Learn the difference.
You never enjoy shown how Colpo is qualified to interpret ANYTHING medical.
Try reading the community guidelines.
You are not asking a cross-question, but yes I do know almost his book. It is especially interesting reading and it adjectives seem to build sense. I hold other thought that it wasn't your cholesterol height but I freshly never question the medical world. I hold be an RN for 28 years and his book is one that I enjoy recommended to some of my patients.
Razzi, do you believe surrounded by progress? People 60 years ago swore up and down that smoking be suitable for you. Since consequently it have be PROVEN that lung cancer, throat cancer, stomach cancer, bladder cancer, as all right as heart disease, etc are DIRECTLY related to smoking. 60-70 years ago fat, sugar, and cholesterol be not even dreamed of cause disease. Let alone person competent to assessment the blood level of it. It have very soon be PROVEN that cholesterol level of 200(normal for Americans) is DIRECTLY related to a mortality rate of 50%!!. But if your cholesterol is smaller quantity than 125mg%, you enjoy no increased annihilation rate from heart or stroke. There are enormously few conditions that hold a 50% mortality rate that can be so simply corrected. It is powerfully prearranged that almost every heart Doctor within the USA is prescribing and have be taking themselves a statin, which blocks the production of cholesterol in the liver, for at tiniest ten years. Many enjoy added Zetia which blocks the uptake of cholesterol from the gut. I am told the destruction rate contained by the USA have dropped some 50,000/yr as of 2005 statistics. It is feel that it is because of lowering the cholesterol beside the use of statins.
Razzi, ranting, cursing, and nickname calling will not tuning these facts. These facts are not even experimental per se. They are from Life insurance actuarial table. Try reading info from the end few years and toss out adjectives those matured 'studies' from 70 years ago.
I hold be diagnosed beside extremely soaring cholesterol for decades. I own be on multiple treatments including every statin out nearby, fibrates, niacin... you mark it, I've tried it. Although I enjoy have great nouns getting my number as low as 147 (with a 66 hdl) I other feel worse. I begin exhibiting muscle wasting symptoms due to the mixed treatments that the doctors hold put me on.
After reading Mr Colpo's book 2 years ago. I enjoy unseen my cholesterol numbers, focused on reducing inflammation and repairing the destabilized cause by years of bogus treatments.
I can very soon say aloud lacking any reservation that I touch better than I enjoy contained by frequent, copious years. My numbers a road up again, but my heart is in great shape (confirmed by MRI's, ultrasounds and EKG's).
Statins are the greatest slump out near perpetuate by drug companies trying to engineer profits, Dr's too busy & anxious to walk against the establishment and the common populations desire for a panacea, cure-all.